I am a soccer fan and I have no apologies for it. I do not only love to watch the skills, talent in display but also the style. Above all I learn lots of lessons from a soccer game. On several occasions I have used the analogy of a soccer game to help me in teaching.
Last week, on Thursday 20 September 2007, I woke up early morning to the news that
Mr. Jose Mario dos Santos Felix Mourinho the (former)
Chelsea FC Manager had quit the club. It came out of the blue, not only for me but for several other commentators. Again I thought I would be the only one to miss him but several have confessed similarly.
When I got the news, I quickly thought of the legacy he left at Chelsea FC. I scribbled something for the press but it is not out and probably will not - the news is getting stale. This blog should surely publish it:
TEN REASONS WHY I THINK JOSE MOURINHO IS ‘THE SPECIAL ONE’I woke up to the news early Thursday 20 September 2007 morning that Jose Mourinho had quit Chelsea FC as manager. Thanks to BBC Radio service. I could not help but think about his legacy. He surely will never, by any measure, be described as the worst manager the English Premiership (or Soccer) has seen. Take it or leave it; believe it or not (hide your head in the sand); love him or hate him, I think Jose Mourinho (JM) has a legacy and is an inspiration. I volunteer highlights of only ten reasons why.
o
JM is a risk taker. JM took decisions out of the ordinary. I guess he did this because of his understanding of the risk-reward ratio. Where there is a big risk, there is a big reward if the transaction succeeds. He was not shy to make two or three changes at once half way a match or even deploying a defender as striker. On some occasions it paid and on others it did not – that is life (better try and fail than fail to try).
o
Winning spirit – JM hated to lose and this motivated him to aim higher and higher and also to believe in himself. This in turn motivated and spurred the players match after match.
o JM’s troubles with the club owners started sometime back but despite all those troubles, he stuck in there and continued to do what he knew best. Thanks to his
resilience. The spirit of resilience also rubbed on the players and eventually club. Many will recall how Chelsea performed against odds in the previous season when injuries dictated to the extent that a third choice goalkeeper and a make-shift defence had to play against an attack-minded Barcelona in the UEFA Champions League. Despite these troubles, Chelsea progressed in the UEFA Champions League (semi finals), won the FA cup and finished second in the English Premier League. Resilience in character.
o
Motivation. I love the moments JM teased the press with the possibility of winning four trophies in a season. I do not believe that any team can do it in this era. The gullible press unfortunately took that as a bench mark to judge JM’s performance. I see a different side of it, as summarised in this West African saying: ‘
when you aim at the moon, you will surely come down with a few stars’. Think Big and make the squad think likewise and you will pick at least one trophy a season. It worked for JM – he motivated/led the players to aim high.
o JM ‘introduced’ a new
style of soccer which was, to some degree, shared by Mr. Rafael Benitez. He studied and recorded game details; created a defensive mindset even in attack-minded players and in the process he used the players effectively – the focus was three points (a win) in every match and a win (3 points) needed just one extra goal. Period. He was comfortable with a 1-0 win even when he would possibly have spurred his boys to score more. It is a fact that in a game of points one should aim at attaining the highest number of points and in a game of knock-outs, one aims at a win. This is only logical and I think it is a principle in life but critics soon described the style as ‘boring’. No wonder they criticized Chelsea and Liverpool on their style of play. I guess the critics were not happy because the style had ‘robbed’ off trophies from the usual suspects. Liverpool soon took the UEFA Champions League trophy and Chelsea took a few local ones. It paid and proved that the style works. A paradigm shift? Before he left, JM had promised a different style and we had started seeing it unfold in the form of accurate one touch passes, back heels, dribbles, etc but alas, he is out before delivering his promise. If he stayed maybe his critics would drop the word 'boring' and pick on I don't know what.
o
Independence of opinion and speaking out of his gut feelings. This factor could have contributed to his exit. JM did not fear to express his opinion on anything (for or against). I will not be surprised if one of the causes of his exit is not related to his opinion on signings and the Club owner’s interference with his work. I still do not believe that JM chose to sign (and play) Andriy Shevchenko, Michael Ballack and I do not think he kept his opinion secret about it. It is rumoured that these players were personal preferences of the club owner (or is it his family members). JM would not last in such an environment.
o Being Ugandan (African), I could not miss this one. JM, through some means, got
African players onto the first 11 selection sheet. He developed and brought to light the beauty of African talents in Essien, Kalou, Drogba, Obi and Geremi. I pray the next manager keeps them on and also that they collectively stick with Chelsea (Geremi is gone to do wonders elsewhere – it is already obvious).
o The
English image of the team. Not so much because I am an England supporter but more because I am a strong proponent of the notion that clubs in the National Leagues should have a good number of the citizen of that country in their squads, actually on the first 11 selection sheet. JM maintained Terry, Lampard, Bridge, A. Cole, J. Cole, Wright-Phillips on his first 11, I believe, partly in respect of the country (England).
o He subtly introduced the
60/30 principle. We have all heard of the 90/10 and the 80/20 principles elsewhere but JM invented the 60/30 principle in soccer. Many soccer analysts unfortunately missed it! This is a simple rotational strategy – change players 30 minutes to the end of the game (60minutes into the game). This does one or all of three things: the first is to give every first team member an opportunity to play; secondly to bring in a player/players who can change the direction of a match and thirdly to strategically rest a player for the next game. Barring injuries, most managers make changes ten minutes to the end of the match with the hope of changing the direction of the game but unless it is a defender introduced, the fresh player rarely makes significant match-changing impact.
o JM, with ease, created (conquered?), occupied and maintained space for himself in many
people’s minds – both as friend or foe in equal measure. Every football fan, every sports analyst on TV, Radio, Newspaper thought about or mentioned JM’s name almost once every week either in praise or otherwise. In fact he created / made jobs easier for many football analysts. One of the Sports Columnist for the "New Vision" newspaper in Uganda, Mr. Aldrine Nsubuga Sr. (an ardent critic of Mourinho/Chelsea and Wenger/Arsenal – my perception) once surprisingly described him as “a stranger who came to become a landlord in a foreign land at nobody’s invitation” and as “a man who has come to challenge the established order in Europe”. I couldn’t agree more. He did exactly that.
Hate him, love him, JM made his mark and I believe that his departure from Stamford Bridge is a big relief to many managers in the English Premiership, at least for the time his destination is not defined. He has been a big pain to them. Unfortunately, all the above attributes, either singly or collectively, seem to have attracted hatred for Chelsea FC and members of the Chelsea squad among many sports analysts, football governing bodies and even some match officials. Who is not hated by somebody anyway, sometimes even for no genuine reason?
Photos from ESPN Soccernet